Table 3: The measurement model of ‘influencing’ sub-domain: Fit statistics.
|
Item |
Domain |
Std L |
P |
Cronbach’s α |
|
Adv1 |
Advisor |
0.788 |
|
0.959 |
|
Adv2 |
Advisor |
0.784 |
*** |
|
|
Adv3 |
Advisor |
0.321 |
*** |
|
|
Adv4 |
Advisor |
0.777 |
*** |
|
|
Art1 |
Articulative |
0.69 |
|
|
|
Art2 |
Articulative |
0.734 |
*** |
|
|
Art3 |
Articulative |
0.633 |
*** |
|
|
Art4 |
Articulative |
0.768 |
*** |
|
|
Coll1 |
Collaborator |
0.717 |
|
|
|
Coll2 |
Collaborator |
0.693 |
*** |
|
|
Coll3 |
Collaborator |
0.85 |
*** |
|
|
Coll4 |
Collaborator |
0.809 |
*** |
|
|
Cor1 |
Courageous |
0.768 |
|
|
|
Cor2 |
Courageous |
0.549 |
*** |
|
|
Cor3 |
Courageous |
0.724 |
*** |
|
|
Cor4 |
Courageous |
0.744 |
*** |
|
|
Conv1 |
Convincing |
0.607 |
|
|
|
Conv2 |
Convincing |
0.793 |
*** |
|
|
Conv3 |
Convincing |
0.534 |
*** |
|
|
Conv4 |
Convincing |
0.607 |
*** |
|
|
Dev1 |
Developer |
0.821 |
|
|
|
Dev2 |
Developer |
0.789 |
*** |
|
|
Dev3 |
Developer |
0.857 |
*** |
|
|
Dev4 |
Developer |
0.771 |
*** |
|
|
Enz1 |
Energiser |
0.744 |
|
|
|
Enz2 |
Energiser |
0.825 |
*** |
|
|
Enz3 |
Energiser |
0.684 |
*** |
|
|
Enz4 |
Energiser |
0.853 |
*** |
|
|
* The first item for each subscale was set to 1.00. All factor loadings were significant at p< 0.001. |
||||