<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<article>
<meta-data>
<journal-meta>
<journal-name>International Archives of Public Health and Community Medicine

</journal-name>
<journal-shortname>Int Arch Public Health Community Med</journal-shortname>
<journal-doi>10.23937/2643-4512</journal-doi>
<issn>2643-4512</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>ClinMed International Library</publisher-name>
<publisher-location>Wilmington, USA</publisher-location>
<publisher-doi-prefix>10.23937</publisher-doi-prefix>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-title>
Reimagining Health Policy through the Lens of Vedanta
</article-title>
<citation_author>Patel P</citation_author>
<article-doi>10.23937/2643-4512/1710089</article-doi>
<article-description>
The philosophical system of Vedanta has had a profound influence on Hindu thought and practice, and we can explore its relevance in shaping contemporary health policy. As one of the six orthodox schools of Hindu philosophy, Vedanta is based on the teachings of the Upanishads, which explore fundamental questions about the nature of reality and the self. 
</article-description>
</article-meta>
</meta-data>
<body>
<article-type>Research Article</article-type>
<volume>7</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<access-type>OPEN ACCESS</access-type>
<article-doi>10.23937/2643-4512/1710089</article-doi>
<article-title>
Reimagining Health Policy through the Lens of Vedanta
 
</article-title>
<Author-Group>
<aut id="aut1">
<label>Author-1</label>
<name>Pragat Patel</name>
<affiliation>
University of Maryland, College Park, USA
</affiliation>
</aut>
</Author-Group>
<author-notes>
<corres-author>
<label>Corresponding-Author</label>
<name>Pragat Patel</name>
<address>
 University of Maryland, College Park, 8308 Dawn Court, Ellicott City, MD, 21043, USA, Tel: +1-443-374-7669.
</address>
</corres-author>
</author-notes>
<history>
<published-date>
<day>07</day>
<month>June  </month>
<year>2023</year>
</published-date>
</history>
<citation>
<author-names>
<name>Patel P</name>
</author-names>
<published-year>2023</published-year>
<article-title>
Reimagining Health Policy through the Lens of Vedanta
</article-title>
<journal-short-name>Int Arch Public Health Community Med</journal-short-name>
<article-doi>10.23937/2643-4512/1710089</article-doi>
</citation>
<permissions>
<copyright>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Patel P</copyright-holder>
<copyright-notes>
© This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
</copyright-notes>
</copyright>
</permissions>
<article-content>
<Abstract>
<p>
	
	
	The philosophical system of Vedanta has had a profound influence on Hindu thought and practice, and we can explore its relevance in shaping contemporary health policy. As one of the six orthodox schools of Hindu philosophy, Vedanta is based on the teachings of the Upanishads, which explore fundamental questions about the nature of reality and the self. By examining key concepts and principles from Vedanta philosophy, this ancient wisdom can offer valuable insights into the limitations of dominant paradigms and identify new possibilities for more holistic and effective approaches to healthcare. Drawing on insights from Vedanta and current research in health policy, we can identify new pathways for improving health outcomes and promoting greater equity and justice in healthcare. Ultimately, this work demonstrates the importance of incorporating diverse perspectives into health policy discourse and practice to improve health outcomes for all.
</p></Abstract>
<Introduction>
<p>
	
	
	A philosophical system with deep roots in India, Vedanta has had profound influence on Hindu thought, belief, and practice. Considered one of the six orthodox schools of Hindu philosophy [1], Vedanta is based on the teachings of the Upanishads, a collection of ancient texts that explore the nature of reality and the self [1]. Due to its unique perspective on fundamental questions about life, Vedanta offers invaluable viewpoints into the human condition and our realistic role in the world.
</p>
<p>
	In the context of health policy, examining Vedanta can provide a fresh perspective on assumptions and paradigms that underlie current approaches to healthcare. By exploring alternative ways of thinking about health and well-being, we can gain a deeper understanding of the limitations of dominant paradigms and identify new possibilities for more holistic and effective approaches. For example, Vedanta's emphasis on interconnectedness and balance can challenge individualistic and competitive approaches to healthcare. By drawing on these insights, we can develop new frameworks for understanding health and well-being that are more inclusive and equitable.
</p>
<p>
	We can explore the relevance of Vedanta in shaping health policy. Through an examination of key concepts and principles from Vedanta philosophy, we will consider how this ancient wisdom can contribute to contemporary debates and discussions about health and well-being. By bringing together insights from Vedanta and current research in health policy, we aim to identify new pathways for improving health outcomes and promoting greater equity and justice in healthcare [2]. In doing so, we hope to demonstrate the value of incorporating diverse perspectives into health policy discourse and practice.
</p></Introduction>
<The-Core-Concepts-of-Vedanta-Challenging-Conventional-Knowledge>
<p>
	
	
	Vedanta is a philosophical system that originated in ancient India and is considered one of the six orthodox schools of Hindu philosophy [1]. The term "Ved - anta" literally means "end of the Vedas" and refers to the philosophical teachings contained in the Upanishads, which are the concluding portion of the Vedas [1]. The Vedas are ancient Hindu scriptures that contain spiritual knowledge and wisdom. They serve as a foundational text in Hindu belief, providing additional necessity to utilize them in the background of cultural sensitivity.
</p>
<p>
	One of the key concepts in Vedanta is the idea of ultimate reality, or Brahman. According to Vedanta, Brahman is the ultimate reality that underlies all existence and is the source of all being [3]. Brahman is described as infinite, eternal, and unchanging. It is beyond all attributes and qualities and cannot be fully comprehended by the human mind.
</p>
<p>
	Another important concept in Vedanta is non-dualism, or Advaita. This refers to the idea that there is no fundamental separation between the individual self (jiva) and ultimate reality (Brahman) [3]. Instead, the individual self is seen as a manifestation of Brahman. The goal of spiritual practice in Vedanta is to realize this non-dual nature of reality and to experience oneness with Brahman. The concept of Vedanta challenges conventional knowledge and rationality in several ways. First, it posits that ultimate reality cannot be fully understood through intellectual reasoning or empirical observation [4]. Instead, it can only be realized through direct experience. This means that conventional methods of acquiring knowledge, such as scientific inquiry or logical reasoning, are seemingly limited in their ability to reveal the true nature of reality. This question raises many more: how do we know what is truth if our definition of the ideal is sourced from science? Does science even define the world? Second, Vedanta challenges conventional notions of the self and identity. In recent past, a so-called trend has emerged with people longing to find a sense of recognition and reality. A true search for self guides their vision through yogic methods and other such forefronts.
</p>
<p>
	According to Vedanta, the individual self is not separate from ultimate reality but is instead a manifestation of it [3]. This means that our sense of being separate individuals with distinct identities is an illusion. Instead, we are all interconnected and ultimately one with Brahman.
</p>
<p>
	Finally, Vedanta challenges conventional ideas about happiness and fulfillment. According to Vedanta, true happiness and fulfillment cannot be found through external means such as material possessions or sensory pleasures [5]. Instead, it can only be found by realizing our true nature as Brahman. A neighboring conception of this is deemed &#38;ldquo;param anand&#38;rdquo; or simply &#38;ldquo;eternal happiness.&#38;rdquo; Countless organizations and religious group have formed a basis of knowledge and understanding on moving beyond temporary pleasure and longing for long-term more permanent sense of peace. Despite the variability of happiness in today&#38;rsquo;s world, there is an instilled belief that this pathway is constant and provides this positive feeling to all. This means that lasting happiness and fulfillment come from within rather than from external sources. Vedanta offers a unique perspective on reality and the self that challenges conventional knowledge and rationality. By positing an ultimate reality that underlies all existence and emphasizing the non-dual nature of reality, Vedanta provides a framework for understanding our place in the world that transcends primary notions of identity and fulfillment.
</p></The-Core-Concepts-of-Vedanta-Challenging-Conventional-Knowledge>
<The-Limitations-of-Conventional-Knowledge-and-Rationality-in-Health-Policy>
<p>
	
	
	Health policy is a multidisciplinary field which incorporates a myriad of assumptions and paradigms. These contributions shape how we approach health and well-being, and ultimately influence the policies and practices that are put in place to promote health. A primary assumption underlying current approaches to health policy is the idea that health can be understood and addressed through scientific inquiry and rational analysis [6]. This means that health issues are seen as problems that can be solved through the application of scientific knowledge and evidence-based interventions. While this approach has led to many important advances in healthcare, it also has its limitations.
</p>
<p>
	One of the core limitations of conventional knowledge and rationality in addressing complex health issues is that it tends to focus on individual factors rather than systemic ones [7]. This means that health interventions often target individual behaviors or risk factors rather than addressing the underlying social, economic, and environmental determinants of health. As a result, these interventions may have limited impact on improving overall health outcomes. Another limitation of conventional knowledge and rationality in health policy is that it often perpetuates dualities and conflicts [8]. For example, conventional approaches to healthcare often focus on treating illness rather than promoting wellness. While it has its merit, it forms a questionable line between concepts like preventative care and traditional care. This creates a powerful duality between sickness and health, and can lead to conflicts between different approaches to healthcare. It also creates a sense of separation in the academic community on these matters, further contributing to potential developments of disparity. Similarly, conventional approaches to healthcare often prioritize individual responsibility over collective action. This could create conflicts between individual rights and social responsibilities. Current assumptions and paradigms in health policy have their limitations. By relying on conventional knowledge and rationality, these approaches may overlook important systemic factors that influence health outcomes. Additionally, these approaches may perpetuate dualities and conflicts that hinder progress towards more holistic and effective approaches to healthcare.
</p></The-Limitations-of-Conventional-Knowledge-and-Rationality-in-Health-Policy>
<The-Role-of-Vedanta-in-Informing-Health-Policy-Assumptions-and-Paradigms>
<p>
	
	
	The concept of Vedanta can inform health policy assumptions and paradigms in several ways. By offering a unique perspective on reality and the self, Vedanta can challenge conventional knowledge and rationality and provide new insights into complex health issues.
</p>
<p>
	One way in which Vedanta can inform health policy assumptions and paradigms is by emphasizing the diversity and complexity of reality. According to Vedanta, reality is not a fixed or static entity but is instead constantly changing and evolving [9]. This means that simplistic assumptions about health and well-being may not accurately reflect the complexity of the world we live in. Of course, our viewpoint on health policy is consistently evolving but in comparison to the rate at which medicine is growing, our policy initiatives are simply miniscule. There will not be one simple policy which applies for all and Vedanta can help complement our understanding of sciences and develop a keen sense of belief in pursuing more applicable legislation. By recognizing this complexity, we can develop more nuanced and effective approaches to health policy.
</p>
<p>
	Another way in which Vedanta can inform health policy assumptions and paradigms is by offering potential solutions to dualities and conflicts. As we have seen, conventional approaches to healthcare often perpetuate dualities and conflicts that hinder progress towards more holistic and effective approaches. Vedanta, with its emphasis on non-dualism and interconnectedness, can provide a framework for transcending these dualities and conflicts [10,11]. For all of history, there has been a difficulty considering a singular guidance in policy, always favoring or biased towards one side or another. By recognizing the interconnectedness of all beings and the importance of balance and harmony, we can develop health policies that promote greater equity and justice. It can help us alleviate potential concerns with inequities forming from policy application and better dedicate the work to the overall good.
</p>
<p>
	Vedanta offers a unique perspective on reality and the self that can inform health policy assumptions and paradigms. By emphasizing the diversity and complexity of reality, Vedanta challenges simplistic assumptions about health and well-being. Additionally, by offering potential solutions to dualities and conflicts in health policy, Vedanta provides a framework for developing more holistic and effective approaches to healthcare. Utilizing it as a complement to research and governmental approaches can help spread a sense of unity in policy, rather than contributing to duality.
</p></The-Role-of-Vedanta-in-Informing-Health-Policy-Assumptions-and-Paradigms>
<Conclusion>
<p>
	
	
	Vedanta has current relevance in shaping health policy assumptions and paradigms. We have seen how Vedanta offers a unique perspective on reality and the self that challenges conventional knowledge and rationality. By emphasizing the diversity and complexity of reality, Vedanta can inform health policy by providing new insights into complex health issues. Additionally, Vedanta can offer potential solutions to dualities and conflicts in health policy. By recognizing the interconnectedness of all beings and the importance of balance and harmony, Vedanta provides a framework for developing more holistic and effective approaches to healthcare. In light of these insights, it is clear that Vedanta has much to offer in the current context of health policy. By incorporating the insights of Vedanta into our thinking about health and well-being, we can develop more nuanced and effective approaches to healthcare. Looking to the future, there is much scope for further research and inquiry into the relevance of Vedanta in shaping health policy. Continuing to explore the insights of this ancient philosophical system, we can deepen our understanding of complex health issues and identify new pathways for improving health outcomes.
</p></Conclusion>
<Acknowledgements>
<p>
	
	
	The author has no funding or acknowledgements to disclose.
</p></Acknowledgements>
<Conflicts-of-Interest>
<p>
	
	
	The author has no conflict of interest to disclose.
</p>

</Conflicts-of-Interest>


</article-content>

<article-references>
<title>References</title>

		 
<ref id="ref1">
    <label>Reference-1</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Kleiber T, Kunz L, Disselhorst-Klug C (2015) Muscular coordination of biceps brachii and brachioradialis in elbow flexion with respect to hand position. Front Physiol 6: 215.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26300781/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref2">
    <label>Reference-2</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Jarrett CD, Weir DM, Stuffman ES, Jain S, Schmidt CC (2012) Anatomic and biomechanical analysis of the short and long head components of the distal biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21: 942-948.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21813298/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref3">
    <label>Reference-3</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Deopujari R, Quadir N, Athavale S, Gajbhiye V, Kotgirwar S (2014) Variant bicipital aponeurosis: A cadaveric study. PSJR 7: 43-46.
				    https://www.pjsr.org/PDF/pdfjuly14/Case%20Series/DeaopujariR.pdf
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref4">
    <label>Reference-4</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Ellis H (2010) The antecubital fossa. Surg 28: E1-E9.
				    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0263931909001239
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref5">
    <label>Reference-5</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Ramsey ML (1999) Distal biceps tendon injuries: Diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 7: 199-207.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10346828/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref6">
    <label>Reference-6</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Seiler JG, Parker LM, Chamberland PD, Sherbourne GM, Carpenter WA (1995) The distal biceps tendon. Two potential mechanisms involved in its rupture: Arterial supply and mechanical impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4: 149-156.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7552670/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref7">
    <label>Reference-7</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Safran MR, Graham SM (2002) Distal biceps tendon ruptures: Incidence, demographics, and the effect of smoking.&#38;nbsp;Clin Orthop Relat Res 404: 275-283.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12439270/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref8">
    <label>Reference-8</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Lantto I, Heikkinen J, Flinkkil&#38;auml; T, Ohtonen P, Leppihahti J (2015) Epidemiology of achilles tendon ruptures: Increasing incidence over a 33-year period. Scand J Med Sci Sports 25: e133-e138.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24862178/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref9">
    <label>Reference-9</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Park SH, Lee HS, Young KW, Seo SG (2020) Treatment of acute achilles tendon rupture. Clin Orthop Surg 12: 1-8.
				    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031433/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref10">
    <label>Reference-10</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Kelly MP, Perkinson SG, Ablove RH, Tueting JL (2015) Distal biceps tendon ruptures: An epidemiological analysis using a large population database.&#38;nbsp;Am J Sports Med 43: 2012-2017.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26063401/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref11">
    <label>Reference-11</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Thomas JR, Lawton JN (2017) Biceps and triceps ruptures in athletes.&#38;nbsp;Hand Clin 33: 35-46.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27886838/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref12">
    <label>Reference-12</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Michna H (1987) Tendon injuries induced by exercise and anabolic steroids in experimental mice. Int Orthop 11: 157-162.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3610410/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref13">
    <label>Reference-13</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Visuri T, Lindholm H (1994) Bilateral distal biceptendon avulsions with use of anabolic steroids. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26: 941-944.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3610410/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref14">
    <label>Reference-14</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Miyamoto RG, Elser F, Millett PJ (2010) Distal biceps tendon injuries.&#38;nbsp;J Bone Joint Surg Am 92: 2128-2138.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20810864/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref15">
    <label>Reference-15</label>
    <mixed-citation>
				Chevallier CH (1953) Sur un cas de d&#38;eacute;sinsertion du tendon bicipital inferieur. Mm Acad de Chir 79: 137-139.
				    #
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref16">
    <label>Reference-16</label>
    <mixed-citation>
				Gilcreest EL (1925) Rupture of muscles and tendons, particularly subcutaneous rupture of the biceps flexor cubiti. J Am Med Assoc 84: 1819-1822.
				    #
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref17">
    <label>Reference-17</label>
    <mixed-citation>
				Thomas WJJ (1958) Avulsion of the distal tendon of biceps brachii from the radial tuberosity. South Afr Med J 32: 1040-1042.
				    #
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref18">
    <label>Reference-18</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Kron SD, Satinsky VP (1954) Avulsion of the distal biceps brachii tendon. Am J Surg 88: 657-659.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13197658/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref19">
    <label>Reference-19</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Baker BE, Bierwagen D (1985) Rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii. Operative versus non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg AM 67: 414-417.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3972865/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref20">
    <label>Reference-20</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Chillemi C, Marinelli M, De Cupis V (2007) Rupture of the distal biceps brachii tendon: Conservative treatment versus anatomic reinsertion - clinical and radiological evaluation after 2 years. Arch Orthop Traum Surg 127: 705-708.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17468875/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref21">
    <label>Reference-21</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Freeman CR, McCormick KR, Mahoney D, Baratz M, Lubahn JD (2009) Nonoperative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures compared with a historical control group. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91: 2329-2334.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19797566/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref22">
    <label>Reference-22</label>
    <mixed-citation>
						Hetsroni I, Pilz-Burstein R, Nyska M, Back Z, Barchilon V, et al. (2008) Avulsion of the distal biceps brachii tendon in middle-aged population: is surgical repair advisable? A comparative study of 22 patients treated with either nonoperative management or early anatomical repair.&#38;nbsp;Injury 39: 753-760.
					    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18541242/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref23">
    <label>Reference-23</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Cerciekki S, Vison&#38;agrave; E, Corona K, Filho PRR, Carbone S (2018) The treatment of distal biceps ruptures: An overview. Joints 6: 228-231.
				    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6930125/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref24">
    <label>Reference-24</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Meherin JM, Kilgore ES (1960) The treatment of ruptures of the distal biceps brachii tendon. Am J Sur 99: 636-640.
				    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0002961060900064
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref25">
    <label>Reference-25</label>
    <mixed-citation>
				<em>
					Johnson AB
				</em>
					(1897) Avulsion of biceps tendon from the radius.&#38;nbsp;
				<em>
					N Y Med J
				</em>
				<em>
					66
				</em>
				:
				<em>
					261
				</em>
				-26
				    #
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref26">
    <label>Reference-26</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Waugh RL, Hathcock TA, Elliot JL (1949) Ruptures of muscles and tendons with particular reference to rupture or elongation of long tendon, of biceps brachii with report of 50 cases. Surg 25: 370-392.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18113327/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref27">
    <label>Reference-27</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Lee H (1951) Traumatic avulsion of tendon of insertion of biceps brachii.&#38;nbsp;Am J Surg 82: 290-292.
				    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0002961051903637
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref28">
    <label>Reference-28</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Platt H (1931) Observations on some tendon ruptures. Br Med J 1: 611-615.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20776109/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref29">
    <label>Reference-29</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Camp CL, Voleti PB, Corpus KT, Dines JS (2016) Single-Incision technique for repair of distal biceps tendon avulsions with intramedullary cortical button. Arthrosc Tech 5: e303-e307.
				    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212628716000049
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref30">
    <label>Reference-30</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Amin NH, Volpi A, Lynch TS, Patel RM, Cerynik DL, et al. (2016) Complications of Distal Biceps Tendon Repair. Orthop J Sports Med 4: 2325967116668137.
				    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5056595/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref31">
    <label>Reference-31</label>
    <mixed-citation>
						Boyd HB, Anderson LD (1961) A method for reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon.&#38;nbsp;J Bone Joint Surg Am 43-A: 1041-1043.
					    https://journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal/Abstract/1961/43070/A_Method_for_Reinsertion_of_the_Distal_Biceps.12.aspx
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref32">
    <label>Reference-32</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Castione D, Mercurio M, Fanelli D, Cosentino O, Gasparini G, et al. (2020) Single- versus double-incision technique for the treatment of distal biceps tendon rupture. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Bone Joint J 102-B: 1608-1617.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33249900/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref33">
    <label>Reference-33</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Carroll MJ, Dacambra MP, Hildebrand KA (2014) Neurologic complications of distal biceps tendon repair with 1-incision endobutton fixation. Am J Orthop 43: e159-e162.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25046193/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref34">
    <label>Reference-34</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Kettler M, Tingart MJ, Lunger J, Kuhn LV (2008) Reattachment of the distal tendon of biceps. Factors affecting the failure strength of the repair. Bone Joint J 90: 103-106.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18160510/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref35">
    <label>Reference-35</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Recordon JA, Misur PN, Isaksson F, Poon PC (2015) Endobutton versus transosseous suture repair of distal biceps rupture using the two-incision technique: A comparison series. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24: 928-933.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25861852/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref36">
    <label>Reference-36</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Spang JT, Weinhold PS, Karas SG (2006) A biomechanical comparison of EndoButton versus suture anchor repair of distal biceps tendon injuries. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15: 509-514.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16831659/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref37">
    <label>Reference-37</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Reichert P, Kr&#38;oacute;likowska A, Kentel M, Witkowski J, Gnus J, et al. (2019) A comparative clinical and functional assessment of cortical button versus suture anchor in distal biceps brachii tendon repair. J Orthop Sci 24: 103-108.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30219603/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref38">
    <label>Reference-38</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Rose DM, Archibald JD, Sutter EG, Belkoff SM, Wilckens JH (2011) Biomechanical analysis suggests early rehabilitation is possible after single-incision EndoButton distal biceps repair with fiber wire. Knee Surg, Sports Traumatol, Arthrosc 19: 1019-1022.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21161173/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref39">
    <label>Reference-39</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Logan CA, Shahien A, Haber D, Foster Z, Farrington A, et al. (2019) Rehabilitation following distal biceps repair.&#38;nbsp;Int J Sports Phys Ther 14: 308-317.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30997282/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>


</article-references>
</body>
</article>