<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<article>
<meta-data>
<journal-meta>
<journal-name>International Archives of Addiction Research and Medicine
</journal-name>
<journal-shortname>Int Arch Addict Res Med</journal-shortname>
<journal-doi>10.23937/2474-3631</journal-doi>
<issn>2474-3631</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>ClinMed International Library</publisher-name>
<publisher-location>Wilmington, USA</publisher-location>
<publisher-doi-prefix>10.23937</publisher-doi-prefix>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-title>
Pembrolizumab for Locally Advanced or Recurrent/Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Long-Term Results of the Phase 2 Keynote-629 Study
</article-title>
<citation_author>Munoz-Couselo E</citation_author>
<article-doi>10.23937/2474-3631/1510041</article-doi>
<article-description>
Pembrolizumab monotherapy is approved in certain countries, including the US, for treatment of LA or recurrent/metastatic (R/M) cSCC not amenable to surgery based on results from the open-label phase 2 KEYNOTE-629 trial (NCT03284424).
</article-description>
</article-meta>
</meta-data>
<body>
<article-type>Poster</article-type>
<volume>9</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<access-type>OPEN ACCESS</access-type>
<article-doi>10.23937/2474-3631/1510041</article-doi>
<article-title>
Pembrolizumab for Locally Advanced or Recurrent/Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Long-Term Results of the Phase 2 Keynote-629 Study
 
</article-title>
<Author-Group>
<aut id="aut1">
<label>Author-1</label>
<name>Munoz-Couselo E</name>
<affiliation>
Hospital Vall d’Hebron and Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
</affiliation>
</aut>
<aut id="aut2">
<label>Author-2</label>
<name>Hughes BGM</name>
<affiliation>
Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, and University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
</affiliation>
</aut>
<aut id="aut3">
<label>Author-3</label>
<name>Mortier L</name>
<affiliation>
CHRU Lille - Hôpital Claude Huriez, Lille, France
</affiliation>
</aut>
<aut id="aut4">
<label>Author-4</label>
<name>Grob JJ</name>
<affiliation>
Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
</affiliation>
</aut>
<aut id="aut5">
<label>Author-5</label>
<name>Gutzmer R</name>
<affiliation>
Johannes Wesling Medical Center, Ruhr University Bochum, Minden, Germany
</affiliation>
</aut>
<aut id="aut6">
<label>Author-6</label>
<name>Roshdy O</name>
<affiliation>
Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
</affiliation>
</aut>
<aut id="aut7">
<label>Author-7</label>
<name>González Mendoza R</name>
<affiliation>
Centro Estatal de Cancerologíade Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico
</affiliation>
</aut>
<aut id="aut8">
<label>Author-8</label>
<name>Schachter J</name>
<affiliation>
Sheba Medical Center-Tel HaShomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
</affiliation>
</aut>
<aut id="aut9">
<label>Author-9</label>
<name>Arance A</name>
<affiliation>
Hospital Clínici Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
</affiliation>
</aut>
<aut id="aut10">
<label>Author-10</label>
<name>Grange F</name>
<affiliation>
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims-Hôpital Robert Debre, Reims, France
</affiliation>
</aut>
<aut id="aut11">
<label>Author-11</label>
<name>Meyer N</name>
<affiliation>
Institut Universitaire du Cancer and CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
</affiliation>
</aut>
<aut id="aut12">
<label>Author-12</label>
<name>Joshi A</name>
<affiliation>
Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, QLD, Australia
</affiliation>
</aut>
<aut id="aut13">
<label>Author-13</label>
<name>Billan S</name>
<affiliation>
Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
</affiliation>
</aut>
<aut id="aut14">
<label>Author-14</label>
<name>Ojavee SE</name>
<affiliation>
Merck &#38; Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
</affiliation>
</aut>
<aut id="aut15">
<label>Author-15</label>
<name>Yuan J</name>
<affiliation>
Merck &#38; Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
</affiliation>
</aut>
<aut id="aut16">
<label>Author-16</label>
<name>Gumuscu B</name>
<affiliation>
Merck &#38; Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
</affiliation>
</aut>
<aut id="aut17">
<label>Author-17</label>
<name>Bratland Å</name>
<affiliation>
Oslo Universitetssykehus, Oslo, Norway
</affiliation>
</aut>
</Author-Group>
<author-notes>
<corres-author>
<label>Corresponding-Author</label>
<name>González Mendoza R</name>
<address>
 Centro Estatal de Cancerologíade Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico.
</address>
</corres-author>
</author-notes>
<history>
<published-date>
<day>15</day>
<month>July </month>
<year>2024</year>
</published-date>
</history>
<citation>
<author-names>
Munoz-Couselo E, Hughes BGM, Mortier L, Grob JJ, Gutzmer R
</author-names>
<published-year>2024</published-year>
<article-title>
Pembrolizumab for Locally Advanced or Recurrent/Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Long-Term Results of the Phase 2 Keynote-629 Study
</article-title>
<journal-short-name>Int Arch Addict Res Med</journal-short-name>
<article-doi>10.23937/2474-3631/1510041</article-doi>
</citation>
<permissions>
<copyright>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Munoz-Couselo E, et al. </copyright-holder>
<copyright-notes>
© This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
</copyright-notes>
</copyright>
</permissions>
<article-content>


<Background>
<p>
	
	
	&#38;bull; Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second common non-melanoma skin cancer and primarily treated with surgical resection [1]
</p>
<p>
	&#38;bull; Patients with locally advanced (LA) or metastatic cSCC may not be candidates for curative surgery or radiation, and long-term prognosis is poor for metastatic disease [1-3]
</p>
<p>
	&#38;bull; Pembrolizumab monotherapy is approved in certain countries, including the US, for treatment of LA or recurrent/metastatic (R/M) cSCC not amenable to surgery based on results from the open-label phase 2 KEYNOTE-629 trial (NCT03284424) [4]
</p>
<p>
	○ Objective response rate (ORR) was 50.0% (95% CI, 36.1-63.9) with 9 (16.7%) complete responses (CRs) in the LA cohort and 35.2% (95%CI, 26.2-45.2) with 11 (10.5%) CRs in the R/M cohort
</p>
<p>
	○ 69.2% of patients in the total population experienced a treatment-related adverse event (AE) and 11.9% experienced a grade 3-5 treatment-related event
</p></Background>
<Objective>
<p>
	
	
	&#38;bull; Present updated efficacy and safety results for pembrolizumab in LA and R/M cohorts of KEYNOTE-629 with an additional 38 months of follow-up
</p></Objective>
<Methods>
<p>
	
	
	Figure 1
</p>
<p>
	Figure 1: Study design.
	
	ECOG PS: Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status; IV: Intravenously; Q3W, every 3 weeks. aPatients who discontinued treatment after achieving complete response may be eligible to receive an additional 17 cycles of pembrolizumab if disease progression occurred. View Figure 1
</p>
<p>
	Statistical analysis
	
	&#38;bull; Efficacy and safety were assessed in all patients who received &#38;ge; 1 dose of study treatment
</p>
<p>
	&#38;bull; The primary end point was ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR)
</p>
<p>
	&#38;bull; The secondary end points were disease control rate (DCR; defined as CR + partial response (PR) + stable disease &#38;ge; 12 weeks), duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, overall survival (OS), and safety
</p>
<p>
	&#38;bull; DOR was assessed in all patients with a confirmed CR or PR
</p>
<p>
	&#38;bull; 95% CIs for ORR and DCR were calculated using the exact binomial Clopper-Pearson method
</p>
<p>
	&#38;bull; Event rates over time for DOR, PFS, and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
</p></Methods>
<Results>
<p>
	
	
	&#38;bull; Median time from first dose to the data cutoff date of September 13, 2023, was 52.4 months (range, 47.6-56.9) for the LA cohort, 64.7 months (range, 62.1-69.5) for the R/M cohort, and 63.1 months (range, 47.6-69.5) in the total population (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3).
</p>
<p>
	Figure 2: Patient disposition.
	
	PD: Progressive Disease View Figure 2
</p>
<p>
	Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier estimates of DOR in patients with a confirmed response per RECIST v1.1 by BICR in the LA cSCC cohort, R/M cSCC cohort, and total population. View Figure 3
</p>
<p>
	Figure 4: Duration of treatment and time to response in patients with a confirmed response per RECIST v1.1 by BICR in the (A) LAcSCC cohort and the (B) R/M cSCC cohort. View Figure 4
</p>
<p>
	Figure 5: Kaplan-Meier estimates of (A) PFS per RECIST v1.1 by BICR and (B) OS in the LA cSCC cohort, R/M cSCC cohort, and total population.
	
	NR: Not Reached View Figure 5
</p>
<p>
	Table 1: Baseline characteristics. View Table 1
</p>
<p>
	Table 2: ORR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR. View Table 2
</p>
<p>
	Table 3: AE summary. View Table 3
</p></Results>
<Conclusions>
<p>
	
	
	&#38;bull; With an additional 38 months of follow-up (median follow-up 63.1 months in the total population), pembrolizumab monotherapy continued to demonstrate durable antitumor activity in patients with LA or R/M cSCC
</p>
<p>
	&#38;bull; In the current analysis, ORR, median PFS, and median OS are consistent with the initial analysis at a median time from first dose to data cutoff of approximately 15 months [4]
</p>
<p>
	&#38;bull; One additional patient in the LA cohort achieved a CR since the last data cutoff
</p>
<p>
	&#38;bull; Responses were durable, with a median DOR of 52.5 months and 61.2% of responders in the total population having extended responses that lasted &#38;ge; 36 months
</p>
<p>
	&#38;bull; The safety and tolerability of pembrolizumab remained manageable
</p>
<p>
	&#38;bull; These findings continue to support the use of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with LA or R/McSCC
</p></Conclusions>
<Acknowledgments>
<p>
	
	
	The authors thank the patients and their families and all investigators and site personnel. Medical writing and/or editorial assistance was provided by Maxwell Chang, BSc Hons, and Robert Steger, PhD, of Apothe Com (Yardley, PA, USA). This assistance was funded by Merck Sharp &#38;amp; Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck &#38;amp; Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. Funding for this research was provided by Merck Sharp &#38;amp; Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck &#38;amp; Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
</p></Acknowledgments>
<Contact-Information>
<p>
	
	
	Contact the author at emunoz@vhio.netfor questions and comments.
</p>
<p>
	Copies of this poster obtained through Quick Response (QR) Code are for personal use only and may not be reproduced without permission from ASCO &#38;reg; and the author of this poster.
</p>
<p>
	Presented at the ASCO Annual Meeting; Chicago, Illinois; May 31-June 4, 2024.
</p>
<p>
	Copyright &#38;copy; 2024Merck &#38;amp; Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA and its affiliates. All rights reserved.
</p></Contact-Information>



<figures-and-tables>
	<text>All Figures and Tables link given in below</text>
	<link>https://clinmedjournals.org/articles/iaarm/international-archives-of-addiction-research-and-medicine-iaarm-9-041.php?jid=iaarm</link>
</figures-and-tables>



</article-content>

<article-references>
<title>References</title>

		 
<ref id="ref1">
    <label>Reference-1</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Caudill J, Thomas JE, Burkhart CG (2023) The risk of metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Int J Dermatol 62: 483-486.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35324009/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref2">
    <label>Reference-2</label>
    <mixed-citation>
				Claveau J, Archambault J, Ernst DS, Giacomantonio C, Limacher JJ, et al. (2020) Multidisciplinary management of locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Curr Oncol 27: e399-e407.
				    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467796/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref3">
    <label>Reference-3</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Stratigos AJ, Garbe C, Dessinioti C, Lebbe C, van Akkooi A, et al. (2023) European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Part 2. Treatment-Update 2023. Eur J Cancer 193: 113252.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37708630/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref4">
    <label>Reference-4</label>
    <mixed-citation>
					Hughes BGM, Munoz-Couselo E, Mortier L, Bratland Å, Gutzmer R, et al. (2021) Pembrolizumab for locally advanced and recurrent/metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-629 study): An open-label, nonrandomized, multicenter, phase II trial. Ann Oncol 32: 1276-1285.
				    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34293460/
    </mixed-citation>
</ref>


</article-references>
</body>
</article>